Succession Planning and Executive Leadership: Lessons for Business from Higher Education
July 30, 2025
By Dr. Trent Adams
Many privately held companies and organizations face an all-too-common dilemma: key leaders retire or transition, and no clear internal successor is ready to take the reins. This lack of preparation can result in organizational disruption, stalled growth, cultural misalignment, and costly executive searches.
While my original research focused on presidential succession in Christian higher education, the insights gained hold real value for many businesses and especially those looking to sustain mission-driven leadership and long-term stability at the executive level.
In my study, I interviewed 16 leaders. They were presidents and former presidents of Christian colleges and one executive working closely with private college boards. I sought to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of succession planning for their roles. Their responses offer parallels that are highly applicable to business.
Why Executive Succession Planning Matters
Companies, like colleges, are complex organizations with unique cultures, histories, and strategic goals. Unless thoughtful succession strategies are in place, leadership transitions can disrupt that continuity
Just as only 41% of first-time college presidents reported feeling adequately prepared for their roles (Bornstein, 2010a), many new executives in business struggle with gaps in operational knowledge, leadership readiness, or cultural fit. Proactive succession planning helps close those gaps in advance, offering several key benefits:
- Continuity in mission and strategy
- Stronger leadership pipelines
- Improved morale and retention
- Cost savings compared to external searches
- Better preparation for unexpected departures
What My Research Found And What It Means for Business
- Leadership Development is Happening But Often Informally
In higher education, all leaders interviewed acknowledged engaging in leadership development at some level. Some institutions ran formal year-long programs while others relied on informal mentorship and departmental promotion. Similarly, in business, many companies identify high-potential employees but few have structured development tracks aligned to succession.
Takeaway for Business:Even informal development is better than none but formal programs tied to strategic goals create deeper, more consistent results. Develop systems that identify, mentor, and assess emerging leaders before a vacancy arises.
- Succession Planning is Supported But Difficult to Implement
Opinions on formal succession planning were mixed. Some presidents supported it as a stabilizing force that aligns with long-term institutional goals. Others worried it might create political tension, undermine current leadership, or backfire if internal candidates were not ultimately chosen.
Takeaway for Business:Succession planning requires trust, transparency, and board or C-suite buy-in. Leaders must clearly communicate that development does not guarantee promotion but is part of long-term organizational health. Planning early—rather than waiting until retirement is imminent—can reduce these risks.
- Benefits and Challenges of Succession Planning
Benefits include:
- Smoother leadership transitions
- Reduced risk and downtime
- Culture retention and mission continuity
- Clearer internal career pathways
Challenges include:
- Time and resource investment
- Fear of internal politics
- Potential loss of talent if overlooked candidates leave
- Risk of creating pressure to promote from within even when external candidates may be stronger
Takeaway for Business:Succession planning must be realistic. It won’t eliminate every challenge, but it can mitigate many of them with proper design. Focus on leadership growth over naming an “heir apparent.”
Three Succession Planning Strategies for Business
Based on the findings, here are three strategies businesses can adapt:
- Formal Succession Planning for Executive Roles Using a model such as William Rothwell’s Seven-Pointed Star for Systematic Succession Planning (2010), companies can:
- Align planning with business goals
- Create oversight of succession planning program through a board or executive committee
- Assess internal talent and provide skill-gap training
- Maintain flexibility to consider external candidates
- Evaluate and refine the process regularly
- Internal Executive Leadership Development Programs Many companies send rising leaders to outside organizations for further leadership training. However, building an in-house initiative that is tailored to the company’s values, systems, and strategy can be equally, if not more, effective. Topics like strategic planning, finance, governance, and culture-building should be included allowing emerging leaders to gain a more holistic understanding of their organization.
- Broader Culture of Professional Growth Finally, cultivating a culture of development across the organization, not just at the top, can increase retention and provide more meaningful development for all employees. Mentoring, job rotation, and cross-training can help prepare future executives from deep within the talent pool.
Final Thoughts
Whether you're running a mission-driven nonprofit or a growth-focused private business, intentional leadership development and thoughtful succession planning are key to long-term success.
The lesson is clear: the absence of a plan is, itself, a plan, but it’s one that leaves too much to chance. By investing in your people now, you strengthen your organization for the future.
Dr. Trent Adams serves as the Assistant Dean of Graduate Admissions at ĢTV. His doctoral dissertation, which explored presidential succession planning in Christian higher education, is available on ProQuest. For questions or collaboration opportunities, he can be reached at [email protected].
Bornstein, R. (2010a). Succession planning: The time has come. Trusteeship, 18(5), 28–33.
Rothwell, W. J. (2010). Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within (4th ed.). AMACOM.